Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to Compromise Solution (MARCOS) Method: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame7220241137Keywords:
MARCOS, MCDM, Bibliometric Analysis, Biblioshiny, VOSviewerAbstract
This paper explores the evolution, applications, and prospective developments of a very popular multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method called Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to COmpromise Solution Method (MARCOS). Employing an extensive bibliometric analysis, the study examines 115 pertinent articles sourced from the Scopus database spanning over the years from 2020 to 2024. This study also provides an evaluation of the methodological significance and outlines potential future directions of MARCOS method. The outcomes indicate "Sustainable supplier selection in healthcare industries using a new MCDM method: Measurement of alternatives and ranking according to COmpromise solution (MARCOS)" by Stević et al. (2020) as the most cited paper. Journals such as "Sustainability (Switzerland)", "Mathematics" and "Expert Systems with Applications" stand out among the most cited journals. "University of East Sarajevo" is an institution distinguished for its prolific research in this field. "Stević Ž." Has been identified as the most cited and published author. The most frequently used keywords are "MARCOS", "MARCOS method", and "MCDM". CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria. Correlation (CRITIC) method is a weighting model often integrated with MARCOS method. The results of the study provide researchers and practitioners in the field of MCDM with an important insight into the current state of the MARCOS methodology, highlighted studies and potential future developments. It also provides a comprehensive overview of the importance of this method in the multi-criteria decision-making literature, shedding light on future research directions.
Downloads
References
Alenezi, M., Nadeem, M., Agrawal, A., Kumar, R., & Khan, R. A. (2020). Fuzzy multi criteria decision analysis method for assessing security design tactics for web applications. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 13(5), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.22266/ijies2020.1031.17
Saeed, M., Ahsan, M., & Abdeljawad, T. (2021). A development of complex Multi-Fuzzy Hypersoft set with application in MCDM based on entropy and similarity measure. IEEE Access, 9, 60026–60042. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3073206
Demir, G., Chatterjee, P., & Pamučar, D. (2024). Sensitivity Analysis in Multi-Criteria Decision Making: A State-of-the-Art Research Perspective Using Bibliometric Analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 237, 121660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121660
Demir, G., Chatterjee, P., Zakeri, S., & Pamucar, D. (2024). Mapping the Evolution of Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison Method: A Bibliometric Analysis. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 7(1), 290–314. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame7120241037
Zaliluddin, D. (2023). Bibliometric Analysis of Accuracy of Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) of Assistance Recipients with Fuzzy Logic Algorithm. West Science Interdisciplinary Studies, 1(7), 329-339. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v1i07.82
Vatankhah, S., Darvishmotevali, M., Rahimi, R., Jamali, S. M., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2023). MCDM in travel and tourism research since 1997: A bibliometric approach. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4324990
Liao, H., Yang, S., Kazimieras Zavadskas, E., & Škare, M. (2023). An overview of fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods in hospitality and tourism industries: bibliometrics, methodologies, applications and future directions. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(3), 2150871. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2150871
Herawan, T., Arsyad, S., Widodo, W. I., Adiyanti, A. S., Damiasih, D., Ashartono, R., & Sâri, E. N. (2023). A Decade Bibliometric Analysis of Decision Making in Tourism and Hospitality. In International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications (pp. 17-36). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37126-4_2
Nirmal, D. D., Nageswara Reddy, K., & Singh, S. K. (2023). Application of fuzzy methods in green and sustainable supply chains: critical insights from a systematic review and bibliometric analysis. Benchmarking: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-09-2022-0563
Zyoud, S. H., & Fuchs-Hanusch, D. (2017). A bibliometric-based survey on AHP and TOPSIS techniques. Expert Systems with Applications, 78, 158–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.02.016
Chen, Y., Jin, Q., Fang, H., Lei, H., Hu, J., Wu, Y., Chen, J., Wang, C., & Wan, Y. (2019). Analytic network process: Academic insights and perspectives analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 1276–1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.016
Ferreira, F. A., & Santos, S. P. (2021). Two decades on the MACBETH approach: a bibliometric analysis. Annals of Operations Research, 296(1), 901–925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-3083-9
Koca, G., & Yıldırım, S. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of DEMATEL method. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 4(1), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame2104085g
Ayan, B. & Abacıoğlu, S. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of the MCDM methods in the last decade: WASPAS, MABAC, EDAS, CODAS, CoCoSo and MARCOS. International Journal of Business and Economic Studies, 4(2), 65-85. https://doi.org/10.54821/uiecd.1183443
Badi, I., Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., & Muhammad, L. J. (2023). Wind farm site selection using BWM-AHP-MARCOS method: A case study of Libya. Scientific African, 19, e01511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01511
Wang, N., Xu, Y., Puška, A., Stević, Ž., & Alrasheedi, A. F. (2023). Multi-Criteria Selection of Electric Delivery Vehicles Using Fuzzy–Rough Methods. Sustainability, 15(21), 15541. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115541
Stević, Ž., Mujakovic´, N., Goli, A., & Moslem, S. (2023). Selection of logistics distribution channels for final product delivery: FUCOM-MARCOS model. Journal of Intelligent Management Decision, 2(4), 172-178. https://doi.org/10.56578/jimd020402
Xu, W., Das, D. K., Stević, Ž., Subotić, M., Alrasheedi, A. F., & Sun, S. (2023). Trapezoidal Interval Type-2 Fuzzy PIPRECIA-MARCOS Model for Management Efficiency of Traffic Flow on Observed Road Sections. Mathematics, 11(12), 2652. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11122652
Miškić, S., Stević, Ž., Tadić, S., Alkhayyat, A., & Krstić, M. (2023). Assessment of the LPI of the EU countries using MCDM model with an emphasis on the importance of criteria. World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research, 11(3), 258-279. https://doi.org/10.1504/WRITR.2023.132501
Işık, Ö., Shabir, M., & Belke, M. (2023). Is There a Causal Relationship Between Financial Performance and Premium Production? Evidence from Turkish Insurance Industry. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(2), 1388-1412. https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.1220299
Tešić, D., Božanić, D., Puška, A., Milić, A., & Marinković, D. (2023). Development of the MCDM fuzzy LMAW-grey MARCOS model for selection of a dump truck. Reports in Mechanical Engineering, 4(1), 1-17.
Tešić, D., Božanić, D., Pamučar, D., & Din, J. (2022). DIBR - Fuzzy MARCOS model for selecting a location for a heavy mechanized bridge. VojnotehničKi Glasnik, 70(2), 314–339. https://doi.org/10.5937/vojtehg70-35944
Štilić, A., Puška, A., Božanić, D., & Tešić, D. (2023). Assessing the role of institutional reform in enhancing Balkan sustainable competitiveness: An Entropy-MARCOS perspective. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v7i3.2167
Stanković, M., Stević, Ž., Das, D.K., Subotić, M., & Pamučar, D. (2020). A New Fuzzy MARCOS Method for Road Traffic Risk Analysis. Mathematics, 8(3), 457. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8030457
Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Puška, A., & Chatterjee, P. (2020). Sustainable supplier selection in healthcare industries using a new MCDM method: Measurement of alternatives and ranking according to COmpromise solution (MARCOS). Computers & Industrial Engineering, 140, 106231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106231
Puška, A., Stojanović, I., Maksimović, A., & Osmanović, N. (2020). Project management software evaluation by using the measurement of alternatives and ranking according to compromise solution (MARCOS) method. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 3(1), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.31181/oresta2001089p
Badi, I., & Pamučar, D. (2020). Supplier selection for steelmaking company by using combined grey-MARCOS methods. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 3(2), pp. 37-47. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame2003037b
Chattopadhyay, R., Chakraborty, S., & Chakraborty, S. (2020). An integrated d-MARCOS method for supplier selection in an iron and steel industry. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 3(2), 49-69. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame2003049c
Simić, V., Soušek, R., & Jovčić, S. (2020). Picture fuzzy MCDM approach for risk assessment of railway infrastructure. Mathematics, 8(12),2259. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8122259
Tang, N., Li, B., & Elhoseny, M. (2021). Assessment of English teaching systems using a single-valued neutrosophic MACROS method. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 46(1), 87-111. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nss_journal/vol46/iss1/8
Boral, S., Chaturvedi, S. K., Howard, I., Naikan, V. N. A., & McKee, K. (2021). An integrated interval type-2 fuzzy sets and multiplicative half quadratic programming-based MCDM framework for calculating aggregated risk ranking results of failure modes in FMECA. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 150, 194-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2021.04.006
Ali, J. (2021). A novel score function-based CRITIC-MARCOS method with spherical fuzzy information. Computational and Applied Mathematics, 40(8), 280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-021-01670-9
Iordache, M., Pamucar, D., Deveci, M., Chisalita, D., Wu, Q., & Iordache, I. (2022). Prioritizing the alternatives of the natural gas grid conversion to hydrogen using a hybrid interval rough based Dombi MARCOS model. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47(19), 10665-10688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.130
Salimian, S., Mousavi, S. M., & Antucheviciene, J. (2022). An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy model based on extended VIKOR and MARCOS for sustainable supplier selection in organ transplantation networks for healthcare devices. Sustainability, 14(7), 3795. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073795
Ali, J. (2022). A q-rung orthopair fuzzy MARCOS method using novel score function and its application to solid waste management. Applied Intelligence, 52(8), 8770-8792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-02921-2
Wang, W., Xiao, H., Ding, W., Wu, Q., Chen, X., & Deveci, M. (2023). A Fermatean fuzzy Fine–Kinney for occupational risk evaluation using extensible MARCOS with prospect theory. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 117, 105518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105518
Liu, Q., Hou, J., & Dong, Q. (2023). Modified MARCOS method for industrial competitiveness evaluation of regional cultural tourism with probabilistic hesitant fuzzy information. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 45(1), 93-103. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-224491
Jiskani, I.M., Zhou, W., Hosseini, S., & Wang, Z. (2023). Mining 4.0 and climate neutrality: A unified and reliable decision system for safe, intelligent, and green & climate-smart mining. Journal of Cleaner Production, 410, 137313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137313
Chaurasiya, R., & Jain, D. (2023). A New Algorithm on Pythagorean Fuzzy-Based Multi-Criteria Decision-Making and Its Application. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology. Transactions of Electrical Engineering, 47(3), 871-886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40998-023-00600-1
Du, P., Gong, X., Han, B., & Zhao, X. (2023). Carbon-neutral potential analysis of urban power grid: A multi-stage decision model based on RF-DEMATEL and RF-MARCOS. Expert Systems with Applications, 234, 121026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121026
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111, 1053-1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7
Bakır, M., & Atalık, Ö. (2021). Application of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy MARCOS Approach for the Evaluation of E-Service Quality in the Airline Industry. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 4(1), 127–152. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame2104127b
Torkayesh, A. E., Zolfani, S. H., Kahvand, M., & Khazaelpour, P. (2021). Landfill location selection for healthcare waste of urban areas using hybrid BWM-grey MARCOS model based on GIS. Sustainable Cities and Society, 67, 102712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102712
Ulutaş, A., Karabasevic, D., Popovic, G., Stanujkic, D., Nguyen, P. T., & Karaköy, Ç. (2020). Development of a novel integrated CCSD-ITARA-MARCOS decision-making approach for stackers selection in a logistics system. Mathematics, 8(10), 1672. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8101672
Simić, J. M., Stević, Ž., Zavadskas, E. K., Bogdanović, V., Subotić, M., & Mardani, A. (2020). A novel CRITIC-Fuzzy FUCOM-DEA-Fuzzy MARCOS model for safety evaluation of road sections based on geometric parameters of road. Symmetry, 12(12), 2006. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12122006
Gong, X., Yang, M., & Du, P. (2021). Renewable energy accommodation potential evaluation of distribution network: A hybrid decision-making framework under interval type-2 fuzzy environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 286, 124918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124918
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
