Uncovering the Hidden Insights of the Government AI Readiness Index: Application of Fuzzy LMAW and Schweizer-Sklar Weighted Framework

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame7220241221

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Oxford Insights AI Readiness Index, Weighting criteria, Non-linear analysis, Clustering analysis, AI readiness rankings

Abstract

There is considerable promising in artificial intelligence (AI) and algorithms, with governments worldwide increasingly investing in this transformative technology. The potential benefits include improved performance, cost reduction, efficient management, and crime prediction and prevention, among others. The AI era holds the promise of revolutionizing various aspects of society. However, as countries prepare to leverage the power of artificial intelligence, questions arise about the validity of rankings published on the readiness of the governments for the application of AI. In this article, the weighting criteria that are analysed in the Oxford Insights AI Readiness Index are scrutinized, aiming to provide a more accurate assessment. Instead of conventional averaging, arithmetic and geometric non-linear functions are employed to analyse and assess the rank of the countries. Through clustering analysis, countries are categorized into three distinct groups based on observed criteria, offering a nuanced perspective on government AI readiness. This clustering approach not only facilitates a more effective categorization of countries based on their AI preparedness, but also accentuates the variations and similarities within each cluster, which enables deeper insights into regional trends and pinpoint targeted strategies for enhancement within each cluster.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Nzobonimpa, S., & Savard, J. F. (2023). Ready but irresponsible? Analysis of the Government Artificial Intelligence Readiness Index. Policy & Internet, 15(3), 397-414. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.351

Oxford Insights: Government AI Readiness Index (2023). Accessed 10 January 2024. https://www.oxfordinsights.com/ai-readiness

Berryhill, J., Heang, K. K., Clogher, R., & McBride, K. (2019). Hello, World: Artificial intelligence and its use in the public sector.

De Sousa, W. G., de Melo, E. R. P., Bermejo, P. H. D. S., Farias, R. A. S., & Gomes, A. O. (2019). How and where is artificial intelligence in the public sector going? A literature review and research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.07.004

David, P., Choung, H., & Seberger, J. S. (2024). Who is responsible? US Public perceptions of AI governance through the lenses of trust and ethics. Public Understanding of Science, 09636625231224592.

Borgohain, D. J., Bhardwaj, R. K., & Verma, M. K. (2024). Mapping the literature on the application of artificial intelligence in libraries (AAIL): a scientometric analysis. Library Hi Tech, 42(1), 149-179.

El-Bermawy, A. M. (2023). Government AI Readiness Index 2022. Hikama, (6).

Alhosani, K., & Alhashmi, S. M. (2024). Opportunities, challenges, and benefits of AI innovation in government services: a review. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 4(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-024-00111-w

Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Geyer, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence and the public sector-applications and challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), 596-615. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498103

Zheng, Y., Han, Y., Cui, L., Miao, C., Leung, C., & Yang, Q. (2018). SmartHS: An AI platform for improving government service provision. The Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI-18), 7704-7711. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11382

Chun, A., & Wai, H. (2007). Using AI for E-government automatic assessment of immigration application forms. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2007, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 2, pp. 1684-1691.

Chun, A., & Wai, H. (2008). An AI framework for the automatic assessment of E-government forms. AI Magazin, 29(1), 52-64.

Kawecka, E., Perec, A., & Radomska-Zalas, A. (2024). Use of the Simple Multicriteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Method for Optimization of the High-Alloy Steel Cutting Processby the Abrasive Water Jet. Spectrum of Mechanical Engineering and Operational Research, 1(1), 111-120. https://doi.org/10.31181/smeor11202411

Bouraima, M. B., Jovčić, S., Dobrodolac, M., Pamucar , D., Badi , I., & Maraka, N. D. (2024). Sustainable Healthcare System Devolution Strategy Selection Using the AROMAN MCDM Approach. Spectrum of Decision Making and Applications, 1(1), 46-63. https://doi.org/10.31181/sdmap1120243

Ali, A., Ullah, K., & Hussain, A. (2023). An approach to multi-attribute decision-making based on intuitionistic fuzzy soft information and Aczel-Alsina operational laws. Journal of Decision Analytics and Intelligent Computing, 3(1), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.31181/jdaic10006062023a

Pamucar, D., Zizovic, M., Biswas, S., & Bozanic, D. (2021). A new logarithm methodology of additive weights (LMAW) for multi-criteria decision-making: application in logistics. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering, 19(3), 361-380. https://doi.org/10.22190/FUME210214031P

Schweizer, B. & Sklar, A. (1961). Associative functions and statistical triangle inequalities. Publicationes Mathematicae Debrecen, 8, 169- 186. https://doi.org/10.5486/PMD.1961.8.1-2.16

Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-III. Information sciences, 9(1), 43-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0255(75)90017-1

Hussain, A., & Ullah, K. (2024). An Intelligent Decision Support System for Spherical Fuzzy Sugeno-Weber Aggregation Operators and Real-Life Applications. Spectrum of Mechanical Engineering and Operational Research, 1(1), 177-188. https://doi.org/10.31181/smeor11202415

Imran, R., Ullah, K., Ali, Z., & Akram, M. (2024). A Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Approach for Robot Selection Using Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information and Aczel-Alsina Bonferroni Means. Spectrum of Decision Making and Applications, 1(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.31181/sdmap1120241

Sing, P., Rahaman, M., & Sankar, S. P. M. (2024). Solution of Fuzzy System of Linear Equation Under Different Fuzzy Difference Ideology. Spectrum of Operational Research, 1(1), 64-74. https://doi.org/10.31181/sor1120244

Sarfraz, M. (2024). Application of Interval-valued T-spherical Fuzzy Dombi Hamy Mean Operators in the antiviral mask selection against COVID-19. Journal of Decision Analytics and Intelligent Computing, 4(1), 67–98. https://doi.org/10.31181/jdaic10030042024s

Yazdi, A. K., & Komasi, H. (2024). Best Practice Performance of COVID-19 in America continent with Artificial Intelligence. Spectrum of Operational Research, 1(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.31181/sor1120241

Published

2024-08-09

How to Cite

Nasution, M. K. M., Elveny, M., Pamucar, D., Popovic, M., & Andrić Gušavac, B. (2024). Uncovering the Hidden Insights of the Government AI Readiness Index: Application of Fuzzy LMAW and Schweizer-Sklar Weighted Framework . Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 7(2), 443–468. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame7220241221