Methods for assigning weights to decision makers in group AHP decision-making
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame1901147jKeywords:
Weights; Decision Makers; Analytical Hierarchy Process; Group Decision MakingAbstract
The method known as the analytical hierarchy process (AHP), a theoretical and methodological concept of multi-criteria analysis, is increasingly used in solving various decision-making problems. AHP is an excellent support to both the individual and group decision-making process, however, the involvement of a greater number of decision makers complicates the process and requires a different approach to when an individual decides alone. The synthesis of individual decisions within a group can be done in various ways, but the problem is how to deal with different levels of consistency when there are a number of decision makers. Thus, this paper presents some of the methods for defining the individual weights of decision makers in group AHP decision making.
Downloads
References
Altuzarra, A., Moreno-Jiménez, J. M., & Salvador, M. (2007). A Bayesian priorization procedure for AHP-group decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 182(1), 367-382.
Arnette, A., Zobel C., Bosch D., Pease J., & Metcalfe T. (2010), Stakeholder ranking of watershed goals with the vector analytic hierarchy process: Effects of participant grouping scenarios. Environmental Modelling and Software, 25, 1459–1469.
Bernasconi, M., Choirat, C., & Seri, R. (2014). Empirical properties of group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: Theory and evidence. European Journal of Operational Research, 232(3), 584–592.
Blagojević, B. (2015). Minimizacija odstupanja grupne od individualne odluke primenom inteligentnih stohastičkih algoritama u problemima vodoprivrede i poljoprivrede, Doktorska disertacija, Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Poljoprivredni fakultet, 15. (In Serbian).
Blagojević, B., Srđević, Z., Srđević, B., & Suvočarov, K. (2010). Rangiranje korisnika kredita za opremu za navodnjavanje pomoću Analitičkog hijerarhijskog procesa, Vodoprivreda, 42, 213-222. (In Serbian).
Bryson, N. (1995). A goal programming method for generating priority vectors. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 46(5), 641-648.
Chu, A. T. W., Kalaba, R. E., & Spingarn, K. (1979). A comparison of two methods for determining the weights of belonging to fuzzy sets. Journal of Optimization theory and applications, 27, 531-538.
Crawford, G., & Williams, C. (1985). A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matrices. Journal of mathematical psychology, 29(4), 387-405.
Escobar, M. T., Aguarón, J., & MorenoJiménez J. M. (2004). A note on AHP group consistency for the row geometric mean priorisation procedure. European Journal of Operational Research, 153, 318–322.
Forman, E., & Peniwati, K. (1998). Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 108, 165–169.
Ho, W. (2008). Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications–A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 186(1), 211–228.
Hot, I. (2014). Upravljanje izradom generalnih projekata u oblasti infrastrukture primenom višekriterijumske analize, Doktorska disertacija, Fakultet tehničkih nauka Univerziteta u Novom Sadu. (In Serbian).
Jandrić, Z., & Srević, B. (2000). Analitički hijerarhijski proces kao podrška odlučivanju u vodoprivredi. Vodoprivreda, 186-188, 327–335. (In Serbian).
Lootsma, F. A. (1988). Numerical scaling of human judgment in pairwise–comparison methods for fuzzy multi–criteria decision analysis, Mathematical Models for Decision Support. NATO ASI Series F, Computer and System Sciences, Springer–Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 57–88.
Lootsma, F. A. (1990). T French and the American school in multi–criteria decision analysis. Operations Research, 24(3), 263–285.
Lootsma, F. A., Mensch, T. C. A., & Vos, F. A. (1990). Multi–criteria analysis and budget reallocation in long–term research planning. European Journal of Operational Research, 47, 293–305.
Lukovac, V. (2016). Model za otklanjanje grešaka u sistemu procene performansi vojnih vozača, Doktorska disertacija, Univerzitet odbrane, Vojna akademija, Beograd. (In Serbian).
Ma, D., & Zheng, X. (1991). 9/9–9/1 scale method of the AHP, Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on the AHP, Pittsburgh, 197–202.
Mikhailov, L. (2000). A fuzzy programming method for deriving priorities in the analytic hierarchy process. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51, 341-349.
Nikolić, I., & Borović, S. (1996). Višekriterijumska optimizacija–metode, primena u logistici, softver, Vojnoizdavački zavod, Beograd. (In Serbian).
Ramanathan, R., & Ganesh, L. S. (1994). Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: an evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members’ weightages. European Journal of Operational Research, 79, 249–265.
Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 234–281.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Saaty, T. L. (1999). Decision making for leaders: the analytic hierarchy process for decisions in a complex world, 2, RWS publications.
Srđević, B, Potkonjak, S., Srđević, Z., Škorić, M., & Zoranović, T. (2004). Simulacija grupnog odlučivanja u izboru tehnologije navodnjavanja, Poljoprivreda između suša i poplava, 190-197, Poljoprivredni fakultet, Novi Sad. (In Serbian).
Srđević, B, Suvočarov, K., & Srđević, Z. (2009). Analitički hijerarhijski process: Individualna i grupna konzistentnost donosilaca odluka, Vodoprivreda, 41(1-3), 13-21. (In Serbian).
Srđević, B., Suvočarev K., & Srđević, Z. (2008). AHP grupno odlučivanje bez konsenzusa: Primer planiranja segmentacije mokrog polja, Vodoprivreda, 40, 51-58. (In Serbian).
Subramanian, N., & Ramanathan, R. (2012). A review of applications of Analytic Hierarchy Process in operations management. International Journal of Production Economics, 138(2), 215–241.
Vaidya, O. S., & Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1–29.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
