An approach to rank picture fuzzy numbers for decision making problems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame1902049sKeywords:
Picture fuzzy set, picture fuzzy number, positive ideal solution, positive goal difference, negative goal differenceAbstract
Comparison of picture fuzzy numbers (PFNs) are performed using score and accuracy values. But when both of the score and accuracy values are equal, those PFNs are said to be identical. This article presents a novel method to compare the PFNs even when the score and accuracy values of those PFNs are equal. The proposed ranking method is based on positive ideal solution, positive and negative goal differences, and score and accuracy degrees of the picture fuzzy numbers. A new score function is proposed to calculate the actual score value which depends on the positive and negative goal differences and the neutral degree. Finally, a real-life example has been used to illustrate the efficiency of the proposed method.
Downloads
References
Atanassov, K. T. (1989). More on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy sets and systems, 33(1), 37-45.
Atanassov, K.T., & Georgiev, C. (1993). Intuitionistic fuzzy prolog. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 53, 121-128.
Bhatia, N., & Kumar, A. (2013). A new method for sensitivity analysis of fuzzy transportation problems. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 25(1), 167-175.
Cuong, B. C. (2013). Picture Fuzzy Sets-First Results, Part 1, Seminar “Neuro-Fuzzy Systems with Applications”; Preprint 03/2013 and Preprint 04/2013; Institute of Mathematics: Hanoi, Vietnam.
Cuong, B. C. (2014). Picture fuzzy sets. Journal of Computer Science and Cybernetics, 30(4), 409-420.
Cuong, B. C., & Kreinovich, V. (2013). Picture fuzzy sets-a new concept for computational intelligence problems. In 2013 third world congress on information and communication technologies (WICT 2013) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Cuong, B. C., & Kreinovich, V. (2014). Picture fuzzy sets. Journal of computer science and cybernetics, 30(4), 409-420.
Cuong, C. B., & Son, H. L. (2015). Some selected problems of modern soft computing. Expert Systems with Applications, 42, 51-66.
Das, S., Kar, M. B., Kar, S., & Pal, T. (2018a). An approach for decision making using intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy soft set. Annals of Fuzzy Mathematics and Informatics, 16(1), 99-116.
Das, S., Kar, S., & Pal, T. (2017a). Robust decision making using intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. Granular Computing, 2, 41-54.
Das, S., Kumar, S., Kar, S., & Pal, T. (2017b). Group decision making using neutrosophic soft matrix: An algorithmic approach. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2017.05.001
Das, S., Kumari, P., & Verma, A. K. (2015). Triangular fuzzy soft set and its application in MADM. International Journal of Computational Systems Engineering, 2(2), 85-93.
Das, S., Malakar, D., Kar, S., & Pal, T. (2018b). A brief review and future outline on decision making using fuzzy soft set. International Journal of Fuzzy System Applications (IJFSA), 7(2), 1-43.
Garg, H. (2017). Some picture fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multicriteria decision-making. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 42(12), 5275-5290.
Kumar, A., & Kaur, A. (2012). Optimization for different types of transportation problems with fuzzy coefficients in the objective function. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 23(5), 237-248.
Lesage, E., Valcke, M., & Sabbe, E. (2013). Scoring methods for multiple choice assessment in higher education–Is it still a matter of number right scoring or negative marking?. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39(3), 188-193.
Li, D. F. (2005). Multiattribute decision making models and methods using intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Journal of computer and System Sciences, 70(1), 73-85.
Li, D. F. (2008). Extension of the LINMAP for multiattribute decision making under Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 7, 17-34.
Liu, H. W., & Wang, G. J. (2007). Multi-criteria decision-making methods based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. European Journal of Operational Research, 179(1), 220-233.
Si, A., & Das, S. (2017). Intuitionistic multi-fuzzy convolution operator and its application in decision making. In Computational Intelligence, Communications, and Business Analytics: First International Conference, CICBA 2017, Kolkata, India, March 24–25, 2017, Revised Selected Papers, Part II (pp. 540-551). Springer Singapore.
Singh, P. (2015). Correlation coefficients for picture fuzzy sets. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 28(2), 591-604.
Son, L. H. (2016). Generalized picture distance measure and applications to picture fuzzy clustering. Applied Soft Computing, 46(C), 284-295.
Tarasowa, D., & Auer, S. (2013). Balanced scoring method for multiple-mark questions. In International Conference on Computer Supported Education (Vol. 2, pp. 411-416). SCITEPRESS.
Wang, C., Zhou, X., Tu, H., & Tao, S. (2017). Some geometric aggregation operators based on picture fuzzy sets and their application in multiple attribute decision making. Ital. J. Pure Appl. Math, 37, 477-492.
Wei, G. (2016). Picture fuzzy cross-entropy for multiple attribute decision making problems. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17(4), 491-502.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information Control, 8, 338–356.
Zhang, X., & Xu, Z. (2012). A new method for ranking intuitionistic fuzzy values and its application in multi-attribute decision making. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 11, 135-146.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
