Probabilistic linguistic q-rung orthopair fuzzy Archimedean aggregation operators for group decision-making
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame622023527Keywords:
Probabilistic linguistic q-rung ortho-pair fuzzy sets , PLqRFSs, Archimedean aggregation operators, Full consistency method, FUCOM, multi-criteria group decision-making, MCGDMAbstract
To express uncertain and imprecise information systematically, the concept of probabilistic linguistic q-rung ortho-pair fuzzy set (PLqROFS), which is an advanced version of linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy set and linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy set, considering the instantaneous occurrence of stochastic and non-stochastic-uncertainty. There isn't yet any literature on PLqROFSs that addresses the issue of the relative importance of experts and criteria. The evaluation's findings consequently become irrational. Additionally, the aggregation operators that are currently available on PLqROFSs are too rigid. The primary goal is to resolve these problems by creating a new methodology that makes use of a new flexible aggregation operator. In this paper, a novel integrated framework is suggested to address concerns with group decision-making in PLqROFSs settings by combining the strengths of the power average operator (PAO), the Archimedean operator, and the full consistency method (FUCOM). With the extended variance approach on PLqROFSs, the weight of decision experts is methodically determined in this line. Additionally, the FUCOM on PLqROFSs is used to determine the weight of the criterion. Some probabilistic linguistic q-rung ortho-pair fuzzy Archimedean weighted and power weighted aggregation operators are suggested to aggregate decision experts' preferences. To discuss the viability of the suggested technique, the challenge of choosing a CO2 storage location is given. As alternatives, we have taken into account oilfields, gas fields, basalt formations, and coal resources. Basalt is the best choice, according to the outcome. The stability of our method is demonstrated by the sensitivity analysis of the criteria weights. The comparative analysis demonstrates that, in comparison to the ones already in use, our model is more significant and realistic.
Downloads
References
Akram, M., Naz, S., Edalatpanah, S. A., & Mehreen, R. (2021). Group decision-making framework under linguistic q-rung ortho-pair fuzzy Einstein models. Soft Computing, 25(15), 10309–10334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-05771-9
Atanassov, K. T. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3
Bachu, S. (2000). Sequestration of CO2 in geological media: Criteria and approach for site selection in response to climate change. Energy Conversion and Management, 41(9), 953-970. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(99)00149-1
Badi, I., & Abdulshahed, A. (2019). Ranking the libyan airlines by using full consistency method (FUCOM) and analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 2(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.31181/oresta1901001b
Deb, P. P., Bhattacharya, D., Chatterjee, I., Saha, A., Mishra, A. R., & Ahammad, S. H. (2022). A Decision-Making Model With Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information for Selection of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1 - 15. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2022.3215608
Fazlollahtabar, H., Smailbašic, A., & Stevic, Ž. (2019). FUCOM method in group decision-making: Selection of forklift in a warehouse. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 2(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame1901065f
Folger, P. (2021). Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS ) in the United States. Congressional Research Service. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R44902
Garg, H. (2018). Linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy sets and its applications in multiattribute decision-making process. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 33(6), 1234-1263. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21979
Guo, J., Yin, J., Zhang, L., Lin, Z., & Li, X. (2020). Extended TODIM method for CCUS storage site selection under probabilistic hesitant fuzzy environment. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 93, 106381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106381
Herrera, F., & Martínez, L. (2000). A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 8(6), 746– 752. https://doi.org/10.1109/91.890332
Hezam, I. M., Mishra, A. R., Rani, P., & Alshamrani, A. (2023). Assessing the barriers of digitally sustainable transportation system for persons with disabilities using Fermatean fuzzy double normalization-based multiple aggregation method. Applied Soft Computing, 133, 109910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109910
Hsu, C. W., Chen, L. T., Hu, A. H., & Chang, Y. M. (2012). Site selection for carbon dioxide geological storage using analytic network process. Separation and Purification Technology, 94, 146-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2011.08.019
Kao, C. (2010). Weight determination for consistently ranking alternatives in multiple criteria decision analysis. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 34(7), 1779-1787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2009.09.022
Klement, E. P., & Mesiar, R. (2005). Logical, Algebraic, Analytic and Probabilistic Aspects of Triangular Norms. In Logical, Algebraic, Analytic and Probabilistic Aspects of Triangular Norms. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-51814-9.X5000-9
Klir, G., & Yuan, B. (1995). Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. https://www.academia.edu/15616936/Fuzzy_sets_and_fuzzy_logic_Theory_and_applications_by_George_J_KLIR_and_Bo_YUAN_Prentice_Hall_Upper_Saddle_River_NJ_1995_xv_574_pp_63_ISBN_0_13_101171_5
Kobina, A., Liang, D., & He, X. (2017). Probabilistic linguistic power aggregation operators for multi-criteria group decision making. Symmetry, 9(12), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym9120320
Koksalmis, E., & Kabak, Ö. (2019). Deriving decision makers’ weights in group decision making: An overview of objective methods. Information Fusion, 49, 146-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2018.11.009
Koteras, A., Chećko, J., Urych, T., Magdziarczyk, M., & Smolinski, A. (2020). An assessment of the formations and structures suitable for safe CO2 geological storage in the Upper Silesia coal basin in Poland in the context of the regulation relating to the CCS. Energies, 13(1), 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13010195
Krishankumar, R., Nimmagadda, S. S., Rani, P., Mishra, A. R., Ravichandran, K. S., & Gandomi, A. H. (2021). Solving renewable energy source selection problems using a q-rung orthopair fuzzy-based integrated decision-making approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123329
Krishankumar, R., Sivagami, R., Saha, A., Rani, P., Arun, K., & Ravichandran, K.S. (2022). Cloud vendor selection for the healthcare industry using a big data-driven decision model with probabilistic linguistic information. Applied Intelligence, 52 (12), 13497-13519. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10489-021-02913-2
Krishankumar, R., Ravichandran, K. S., Ahmed, M. I., Kar, S., & Tyagi, S. K. (2019). Probabilistic linguistic preference relation-based decision framework for multi-attribute group decision making. Symmetry, 11(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11010002
Kumar, R., Jilte, R., Nikam, K. C., & Ahmadi, M. H. (2019). Status of carbon capture and storage in India’s coal fired power plants: A critical review. In Environmental Technology and Innovation, 13, 94-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2018.10.013
Liao, H., Jiang, L., Xu, Z., Xu, J., & Herrera, F. (2017). A linear programming method for multiple criteria decision making with probabilistic linguistic information. Information Sciences, 415–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.06.035
Liao, H., Mi, X., & Xu, Z. (2020). A survey of decision-making methods with probabilistic linguistic information: bibliometrics, preliminaries, methodologies, applications and future directions. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 19(1), 81–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-019-09309-5
Lin, M., & Xu, Z. (2018). Probabilistic linguistic distance measures and their applications in multi-criteria group decision making. In Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, 357, 411–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60207-3_24
Liu, D., & Huang, A. (2020). Consensus reaching process for fuzzy behavioral TOPSIS method with probabilistic linguistic q-rung orthopair fuzzy set based on correlation measure. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 35(3), 494-528. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22215
Liu, P., & Li, Y. (2019). Multi-attribute decision making method based on generalized maclaurin symmetric mean aggregation operators for probabilistic linguistic information. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 131(April), 282–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.04.004
Liu, P., & Liu, W. (2019). Multiple-attribute group decision-making based on power Bonferroni operators of linguistic q-rung orthopair fuzzy numbers. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 34(4), 652-689. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22071
Liu, P., Naz, S., Akram, M., & Muzammal, M. (2022). Group decision-making analysis based on linguistic q-rung orthopair fuzzy generalized point weighted aggregation operators. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 13(4), 883–906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-021-01425-2
Liu, P., & Teng, F. (2018). Some Muirhead mean operators for probabilistic linguistic term sets and their applications to multiple attribute decision-making. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 68, 396–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.03.027
Liu, S., Chan, F. T. S., & Ran, W. (2016). Decision making for the selection of cloud vendor: An improved approach under group decision-making with integrated weights and objective/subjective attributes. Expert Systems with Applications, 55, 37-47 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.01.059
Mishra, A.R., Rani, P., Saha, A., Senapati, T., Hezam, I.M., & Yager, R.R. (2022). Fermatean fuzzy copula aggregation operators and similarity measures-based complex proportional assessment approach for renewable energy source selection. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 8 (6), 5223-5248. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40747-022-00743-4
Mishra, A. R., Saha, A., Rani, P., Pamucar, D., Dutta, D., & Hezam, I. M. (2022a). Sustainable supplier selection using HF-DEA-FOCUM-MABAC technique: a case study in the Auto-making industry. Soft Computing, 26(17), 8821–8840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-07192-8
Nguyen, H. T., Walker, C., & Walker, E. A. (2018). A First Course in Fuzzy Logic. In A First Course in Fuzzy Logic. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429505546
Noureddine, M., & Ristic, M. (2019). Route planning for hazardous materials transportation: Multi-criteria decision-making approach. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 2(1), 66-85. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame1901066n
Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1
Pamucar, D., Deveci, M., Canıtez, F., & Bozanic, D. (2020). A fuzzy Full Consistency Method-Dombi-Bonferroni model for prioritizing transportation demand management measures. Applied Soft Computing, 87, 105952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105952
Pamučar, D., Lukovac, V., Božanić, D., & Komazec, N. (2018a). Multi-criteria fucom-mairca model for the evaluation of level crossings: Case study in the Republic of Serbia. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 1(1), 108–129. https://doi.org/10.31181/oresta190120101108p
Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., & Sremac, S. (2018b). A New Model for Determining Weight Coefficients of Criteria in MCDM Models: Full Consistency Method (FUCOM). Symmetry, 10(9), 393. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/10/9/393
Pang, Q., Wang, H., & Xu, Z. (2016). Probabilistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making. Information Sciences, 369, 128-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.06.021
Ramadass, S., Krishankumar, R., Ravichandran, K. S., Liao, H., Kar, S., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2020). Evaluation of cloud vendors from probabilistic linguistic information with unknown/partial weight values. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 97, 106801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106801
Riaz, M., Garg, H., Farid, H. M. A., & Aslam, M. (2021). Novel q-rung orthopair fuzzy interaction aggregation operators and their application to low-carbon green supply chain management. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 41(2), 4109-4126. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-210506
Rodriguez, R. M., Martinez, L., & Herrera, F. (2012). Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. In IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 20(1), 109-119. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2011.2170076
Saaty, T. L. (2002). Decision making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Scientia Iranica, 9(3), 215-229. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijssci.2008.017590
Saha, A., Dutta, D., & Kar, S. (2021). Some new hybrid hesitant fuzzy weighted aggregation operators based on Archimedean and Dombi operations for multi-attribute decision making. Neural Computing and Applications, 33(14), pages 8753–8776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05623-x
Saha, A., Garg, H., & Dutta, D. (2021a). Probabilistic linguistic q‐rung orthopair fuzzy Generalized Dombi and Bonferroni mean operators for group decision‐making with unknown weights of experts. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 36 (12), 7770-7804. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/int.22607
Saha, A., Simic, V., Senapati, T., Dabic-Miletic, S., & Ala, A. (2022). A dual hesitant fuzzy sets-based methodology for advantage prioritization of zero-emission last-mile delivery solutions for sustainable city logistics. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 31 (2), 407-420. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9747951
Saha, A., Mishra, A. R., Rani, P., Hezam, I. M., & Cavallaro, F. (2022a). A q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy FUCOM Double Normalization-Based Multi-Aggregation Method for Healthcare Waste Treatment Method Selection. Sustainability, 14(7), 4171. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074171
Saha, A., Pamucar, D., Gorcun, O. F., & Raj Mishra, A. (2023). Warehouse site selection for the automotive industry using a fermatean fuzzy-based decision-making approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 211, 118497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118497
Senapati, T., Simic, V., Saha, A., Dobrodolac, M., Rong, Y., & Tirkolaee, E.B. (2023). Intuitionistic fuzzy power Aczel-Alsina model for prioritization of sustainable transportation sharing practices. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 119, 105716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105716
Sivagami, R., Ravichandran, K. S., Krishankumar, R., Sangeetha, V., Kar, S., Gao, X. Z., & Pamucar, D. (2019). A scientific decision framework for cloud vendor prioritization under probabilistic linguistic term set context with unknown/partialweight information. Symmetry, 11(5), 682. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11050682
Su, Z., Xu, Z., Zhao, H., Hao, Z., & Chen, B. (2019). Entropy Measures for Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Information. IEEE Access, 7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2916564
Torra V. (2010). Hesitant fuzzy sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 25(6), 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.20418
Torra, V., & Narukawa, Y. (2009). On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision. 2009 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, 1378–1382. https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZY.2009.5276884
Wu, X., Liao, H., Xu, Z., Hafezalkotob, A., & Herrera, F. (2018). Probabilistic Linguistic MULTIMOORA: A Multicriteria Decision Making Method Based on the Probabilistic Linguistic Expectation Function and the Improved Borda Rule. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 26(6), 3688–3702. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2843330
Xu, Z. (2004). A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making with linguistic preference relations. Information Sciences, 166, 19-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2003.10.006
Xu, Z. S. (2005). A multi-attribute group decision making method based on term indices in linguistic evaluation scales. Journal of Systems Engineering, 20(1), 84–88. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271837118_A_multiattribute_group_decision_making_method_based_on_term_indices_in_linguistic_evaluation_scales
Yager, R. R. (2013). Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 22(4), 958–965. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2278989
Yager, R. R. (2017). Generalized Orthopair fuzzy sets. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 25(5), 1222–1230. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2604005
Yazdani, M., Chatterjee, P., Pamucar, D., & Chakraborty, S. (2020). Development of an integrated decision making model for location selection of logistics centers in the Spanish autonomous communities. Expert Systems with Applications, 148, 113208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113208
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I. Information Sciences, 8(3), 199-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5
Zhang, H. (2014). Linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy sets and application in MAGDM. Journal of Applied Mathematics, Article ID 432092. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/432092
Zhang, X., & Xing, X. (2017). Probabilistic Linguistic VIKOR Method to Evaluate Green Supply Chain Initiatives. Sustainability, 9(7), 1231. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071231
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
