Toward Supply Chain 5.0: An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Models for Sustainable and Resilience Enterprise
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame712024955Keywords:
Intelligence techniques, Industry 4.0, Industry 5.0, Resilience supply chain, Sustainable supply chain, Multi-criteria decision making, MCDM, Single value neutrosophic sets, Single value triangular neutrosophic setsAbstract
The enterprises and their supply chain (SC) have undergone significant changes because of the highly complex business environment, dynamism, environmental change, ideas like globalization, and increased rivalry of enterprises in the national and worldwide arena. Additionally, pandemics and crises caused SC disruptions for enterprises. Thus, an enterprise’s SC must constantly be ready to face various obstacles and unpredictable environmental changes. In an era of growing technological advancement, enterprises and their strategies are transforming toward sustainable and resilient SC. For this reason, this study embraces the notion of utilizing technologies such as Artificial intelligence (AI) and big data analytics (BDA) as branches of intelligence techniques of Industry 4.0 (Ind 4.0) and, thereafter, Industry 5.0 (Ind 5.0). Thus, the study contributes to constructing an appraiser model for appraising the enterprises that employ these technologies and techniques in their SC to be sustainable resilience in another meaning resilience supply chain (ReSSC). This model utilized best worst method (BWM) under the governing of Single-valued triangular neutrosophic sets (SVTNSs) to generate an appraiser model. Whereas SVNSs applied in the comparative analysis as a comparative model with the cooperation of AHP, TOPSIS, and WSM to validate our constructed model. The findings of the appraiser model based on MCDM merging with SVTNSs and the comparative model based on MCDM integrated with SVNSs agreed that the optimal key indicator six is securing of data (KI6); otherwise, Key Indicator three is transparency (KI3). Also, these models agreed to recommend enterprises from optimal to worst as En1> En4> En2> En3. From the results of the two models, En1 is the most sustainable and resilient. Contrary, En 3 is the least.
Downloads
References
Mohammed, A., Yazdani, M., Oukil, A., & Santibanez Gonzalez, E. D. (2021). A hybrid MCDM approach towards resilient sourcing. Sustainability, 13(5), 2695. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052695
Hsu, C. H., Yu, R. Y., Chang, A. Y., Liu, W. L., & Sun, A. C. (2022). Applying integrated QFD-MCDM approach to strengthen supply chain agility for mitigating sustainable risks. Mathematics, 10(4), 552. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10040552
Marinagi, C., Reklitis, P., Trivellas, P., & Sakas, D. (2023). The Impact of Industry 4.0 Technologies on Key Performance Indicators for a Resilient Supply Chain 4.0. Sustainability, 15(6), 5185. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065185
Eslamipoor, R., & Nobari, A. (2023). A reliable and sustainable design of supply chain in healthcare under uncertainty regarding environmental impacts. Journal of applied research on industrial engineering, 10(2), 256-272. https://doi.org/10.22105/jarie.2022.335389.146
Hsu, C. H., Chang, A. Y., Zhang, T. Y., Lin, W. D., & Liu, W. L. (2021). Deploying resilience enablers to mitigate risks in sustainable fashion supply chains. Sustainability, 13(5), 2943. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052943
Paul, S. K., & Chowdhury, P. (2021). A production recovery plan in manufacturing supply chains for a high-demand item during COVID-19. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 51(2), 104-125. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-04-2020-0127
Eldrandaly, K. A., El Saber, N., Mohamed, M., & Abdel-Basset, M. (2022). Sustainable Manufacturing Evaluation Based on Enterprise Industry 4.0 Technologies. Sustainability, 14(12), 7376. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127376
Rajesh, R. (2021). Optimal trade-offs in decision-making for sustainability and resilience in manufacturing supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 313, 127596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127596
Taşkan, B., & Karatop, B. (2022). Development of the Field of Organizational Performance During the Industry 4.0Period. International Journal of Research in Industrial Engineering (2783-1337), 11(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.22105/riej.2022.324520.1286
Nayeri, S., Sazvar, Z., & Heydari, J. (2023). Towards a responsive supply chain based on the industry 5.0 dimensions: A novel decision-making method. Expert Systems with Applications, 213, 119267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119267
Yadav, G., Kumar, A., Luthra, S., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Kumar, V., & Batista, L. (2020). A framework to achieve sustainability in manufacturing organisations of developing economies using industry 4.0 technologies’ enablers. Computers in industry, 122, 103280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2020.103280
Gamal, A., Abd El-Gawad, A. F., & Abouhawwash, M. (2023). Towards a Responsive Resilient Supply Chain based on Industry 5.0: A Case Study in Healthcare Systems. Neutrosophic Systems with Applications, 2, 8-24. https://doi.org/10.61356/j.nswa.2023.7
Acioli, C., Scavarda, A., & Reis, A. (2021). Applying Industry 4.0 technologies in the COVID–19 sustainable chains. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 70(5), 988-1016. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-03-2020-0137
Hussein, G. S., Zaied, A. N. H., & Mohamed, M. (2023). ADM: Appraiser Decision Model for Empowering Industry 5.0-Driven Manufacturers toward Sustainability and Optimization: A Case Study. Neutrosophic Systems with Applications, 11, 22-30 https://doi.org/10.61356/j.nswa.2023.90.
Jafari, N., Azarian, M., & Yu, H. (2022). Moving from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0: what are the implications for smart logistics?. Logistics, 6(2), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics6020026
Palanikumar, M., Kausar, N., Ahmed, S. F., Edalatpanah, S. A., Ozbilge, E., & Bulut, A. (2023). New applications of various distance techniques to multi-criteria decision-making challenges for ranking vague sets. AIMS Mathematics, 8(5), 11397-11424. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2023577
Rezaei, A., & Hemati, M. (2022). Providing a Hybrid Fuzzy Approach to Explain Managers’ Mental Paradigms to Prioritize Employee Needs. Journal of Fuzzy Extension and Applications. https://doi.org/10.22105/jfea.2022.335662.1212
Okoli, C. and Schabram, K. (2015) ‘A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research’. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03743
Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Mansory, A., Nasiri, A., & Mohammadi, N. (2021). Proposing an integrated model for evaluation of green and resilient suppliers by path analysis, SWARA and TOPSIS. Journal of applied research on industrial engineering, 8(2), 129-149. https://doi.org/10.22105 /jarie.2021.256316.1206
Rezapour, S., Farahani, R. Z., & Pourakbar, M. (2017). Resilient supply chain network design under competition: a case study. European journal of operational research, 259(3), 1017-1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.11.041
Datta, P. (2017). Supply network resilience: a systematic literature review and future research. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 28(4), 1387-1424. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-03-2016-0064
Hohenstein, N. O., Feisel, E., Hartmann, E., & Giunipero, L. (2015). Research on the phenomenon of supply chain resilience: a systematic review and paths for further investigation. International journal of physical distribution & logistics management, 45(1/2), 90-117. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-05-2013-0128.
Ruiz-Benitez, R., López, C., & Real, J. C. (2017). Environmental benefits of lean, green and resilient supply chain management: The case of the aerospace sector. Journal of cleaner production, 167, 850-862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.201
Keerasuntonpong, P., & Cordery, C. (2018). How might normative and mimetic pressures improve local government service performance reporting?. Accounting & Finance, 58(4), 1169-1200. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12252
Purvis, B., Mao, Y., & Robinson, D. (2019). Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins. Sustainability science, 14, 681-695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5.
Mohamed, M., Sallam, K. M., & Mohamed, A. W. (2023). Transition Supply Chain 4.0 to Supply Chain 5.0: Innovations of Industry 5.0 Technologies Toward Smart Supply Chain Partners. Neutrosophic Systems with Applications, 10, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.61356/j.nswa.2023.74
Stock, T., Obenaus, M., Kunz, S., & Kohl, H. (2018). Industry 4.0 as enabler for a sustainable development: A qualitative assessment of its ecological and social potential. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 118, 254-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.06.026.
Bai, C., Dallasega, P., Orzes, G., & Sarkis, J. (2020). Industry 4.0 technologies assessment: A sustainability perspective. International journal of production economics, 229, 107776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107776
Chen, L., Zhao, X., Tang, O., Price, L., Zhang, S., & Zhu, W. (2017). Supply chain collaboration for sustainability: A literature review and future research agenda. International Journal of Production Economics, 194, 73-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.04.005
Pettit, T. J., Croxton, K. L., & Fiksel, J. (2019). The evolution of resilience in supply chain management: a retrospective on ensuring supply chain resilience. Journal of business logistics, 40(1), 56-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12202
Mohamed, M., & Gamal, A. (2023). Toward sustainable emerging economics based on industry 5.0: leveraging neutrosophic theory in appraisal decision framework. Neutrosophic Systems with Applications, 1, 14-21. https://doi.org/10.61356/j.nswa.2023.3
Ali, A., Mahfouz, A., & Arisha, A. (2017). Analysing supply chain resilience: integrating the constructs in a concept mapping framework via a systematic literature review. Supply chain management: an international journal, 22(1), 16-39. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-06-2016-0197
Singh, N. P., & Singh, S. (2019). Building supply chain risk resilience: Role of big data analytics in supply chain disruption mitigation. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 26(7), 2318-2342. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-10-2018-0346
Zamani, E. D., Smyth, C., Gupta, S., & Dennehy, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence and big data analytics for supply chain resilience: a systematic literature review. Annals of Operations Research, 327(2), 605-632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04983-y
Wong, W. P., Tan, K. H., Govindan, K., Li, D., & Kumar, A. (2021). A conceptual framework for information-leakage-resilience. Annals of Operations Research, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04219-5
Belhadi, A., Kamble, S. S., Zkik, K., Cherrafi, A., & Touriki, F. E. (2020). The integrated effect of Big Data Analytics, Lean Six Sigma and Green Manufacturing on the environmental performance of manufacturing companies: The case of North Africa. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, 119903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119903
Frederico, G. F. (2021). Towards a supply chain 4.0 on the post-COVID-19 pandemic: a conceptual and strategic discussion for more resilient supply chains. Rajagiri Management Journal, 15(2), 94-104. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAMJ-08-2020-0047
Muniz, S.M. (2022). Deployment of Agriculture 4.0 with the Integration of IoT. Computational algorithms and numerical dimensions, 1(3), 122-125. https://doi.org/10.22105/cand.2022.161803.
Fakheri, S. (2022). A comprehensive review of big data applications. Big data and computing visions, 2(1), 9-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.22105/bdcv.2022.325256.1041
Yang, W., Cai, L., Edalatpanah, S. A., & Smarandache, F. (2020). Triangular single valued neutrosophic data envelopment analysis: application to hospital performance measurement. Symmetry, 12(4), 588. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12040588
Yucesan, M., & Gul, M. (2021). Failure prioritization and control using the neutrosophic best and worst method. Granular Computing, 6, 435-449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-019-00206-1
Abdel-Basset, M., Gamal, A., Moustafa, N., Abdel-Monem, A., & El-Saber, N. (2021). A security-by-design decision-making model for risk management in autonomous vehicles. IEEE Access, 9, 107657-107679. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3098675
Adel, A. (2022). Future of industry 5.0 in society: Human-centric solutions, challenges and prospective research areas. Journal of Cloud Computing, 11(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13677-022-00314-5
Qiu, P., Sorourkhah, A., Kausar, N., Cagin, T., & Edalatpanah, S. A. (2023). Simplifying the Complexity in the Problem of Choosing the Best Private-Sector Partner. Systems, 11(2), 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11020080
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
