Multi-criteria Evaluation + Positional Ranking Approach for Candidate Selection in E-voting
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame1902119aKeywords:
E-government, E-democracy, E-voting, MCDM, Candidate Selection, Election, E-Government Maturity Model, GovernanceAbstract
E-voting is one of the most important components of e-democracy and includes interesting research topics, such as the mechanisms of participation in elections, technological solutions to e-voting and the efficient application of those in e-voting. Currently, there are numerous voting systems adopted in many countries of the world and each of those has specific advantages and problems. The paper explores the e-voting system as one of the main tools of e-democracy and analyzes its advantages and drawbacks. Voting results always lead to a broad debate in terms of candidate selection and of whether the candidate elected to a position is suitable for that position. At present, the selection of qualified personnel and their appointment to responsible positions in public administration is one of the topical issues. In the paper, multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) is proposed for the selection of candidates in e-voting. The criteria for candidate selection are determined and the relationship of each candidate with the other candidates is assessed by using a binary matrix. The candidate rank is calculated according to all the criteria. In a numerical experiment, candidate evaluation is enabled based on the selected criteria and ranked by using a positional ranking approach. The proposed model allows for the selection of a candidate with the competencies based on the criteria set out in the e-voting process and the making of more effective decisions as well.
Downloads
References
Abu-Shanab, E., Knight, M., & Refai, H. (2010). E-voting systems: a tool for e-democracy. Management research and practice, 2(3), 264-275.
Alguliyev, R., Aliguliyev, R., & Yusifov, F. (2019). MCDM for candidate selection in e-voting. International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age (IJPADA), 6(2), 35-48.
Ali, R. A., Nikolić, M., & Zahra, A. (2017). Personnel selection using group fuzzy AHP and SAW methods. Journal of Engineering Management and Competitiveness (JEMC), 7(1), 3-10.
Aliguliyev, R. M. (2009). Performance evaluation of density-based clustering methods. Information Sciences, 179(20), 3583-3602.
Andersen, K. V., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2006). E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model. Government information quarterly, 23(2), 236-248.
Anttiroiko, A. V. (2003). Building strong e-democracy: the role of technology in developing democracy for the information age. Communications of the ACM, 46(9), 121-128.
Braun, N., & Brändli, D. (2006). Swiss E-Voting Pilot Projects: Evaluation, Situation Analysis and How to Proceedings, In: Electronic Voting 2006. 2nd International Workshop Co-organized by Council of Europe, IFIPWG8.5 and E-Voting.
Carrizales, T. (2008). Critical Factors in an Electronic Democracy: a study of municipal managers. The Electronic Journal of e-Government, 6(1), 23-30.
Chang, Y. H., Yeh, C. H., & Chang, Y. W. (2013). A new method selection approach for fuzzy group multicriteria decision making. Applied Soft Computing, 13(4), 2179-2187.
Chondros, N., Delis, A., Gavatha, D., Kiayias, A., Koutalakis, C., Nicolacopoulos, I., ... & Zygoulis, F. (2014). Electronic voting systems–from theory to implementation. In E-Democracy, Security, Privacy and Trust in a Digital World: 5th International Conference, E-Democracy 2013, Athens, Greece, December 5-6, 2013, Revised Selected Papers 5 (pp. 113-122). Springer International Publishing.
Concha, G., Astudillo, H., Porrua, M., & Pimenta, C. (2012). E-Government procurement observatory, maturity model and early measurements. Government Information Quarterly, 29, S43-S50.
Drechsler, W., & Madise, U. (2004). Electronic Voting in Estonia. In: Kersting, N., Baldersheim, H. (eds.) Electronic Voting and Democracy. A Comparative Analysis, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 97–108.
Dursun, M., & Karsak, E. E. (2010). A fuzzy MCDM approach for personnel selection. Expert Systems with applications, 37(6), 4324-4330.
Fath-Allah, A., Cheikhi, L., Al-Qutaish, R. E., & Idri, A. (2014). E-Government maturity models: a comparative study International. Journal of Software Engineering & Applications (IJSEA), 5(3), 71-91.
Kabak, M., Burmaoğlu, S., & Kazançoğlu, Y. (2012). A fuzzy hybrid MCDM approach for professional selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 3516-3525.
Kazan, H., Özçelik, S., & Hobikoğlu, E. H. (2015). Election of deputy candidates for nomination with AHP-Promethee methods. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 603-613.
Khorami, M., & Ehsani, R. (2015). Application of Multi Criteria Decision Making approaches for personnel selection problem: A survey. International journal of engineering research and applications, 5(5), 14-29.
Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 122–136.
Lee, J. (2010). 10 year retrospect on stage models of e-Government: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Government information quarterly, 27(3), 220-230.
Lin, H. T. (2010). Personnel selection using analytic network process and fuzzy data envelopment analysis approaches. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 59(4), 937–944.
Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., MD Nor K., Khalifah, Z., Zakwan, N., & Valipour, A. (2015). Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications – a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014. Economic Research – Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 28(1), 516-571.
McCormack, C. B. (2016). Democracy Rebooted: The Future of Technology in Elections, The Atlantic Council of the United States. http://publications.atlanticcouncil.org/election-tech/assets/report.pdf Accessed 10 October 2018.
Meier, A. (2012). eDemocracy & eGovernment. Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Heidelberg.
Meserve, S. A., Palani, S., & Pemstein, D. (2017). Measuring candidate selection mechanisms in European elections: comparing formal party rules to candidate survey responses. www.danpemstein.com Accessed 10 October 2018.
Mukhametzyanov, I., & Pamučar, D. (2018). A Sensitivity analysis in MCDM problems: a statistical approach. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 1(2), 51-80
Musia-Karg, M. (2014). The use of e-voting as a new tool of e-participation in modern democracies. http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/pp/article/viewFile/2101/2091 Accessed 10 October 2018.
Musiał-Karg, M. (2014). The use of e-voting as a new tool of e-participation in modern democracies. Przegląd Politologiczny, 4, 99-110.
Royes, G. F., & Bastos, I. I. (2001). Fuzzy MCDM in election prediction. In 2001 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. e-Systems and e-Man for Cybernetics in Cyberspace (Cat. No. 01CH37236) (Vol. 5, pp. 3258-3263). IEEE.
Sakthivel, G., & Ilangkumaran, M. (2015). A hybrid multi-criteria decision making approach of ANP and TOPSIS to evaluate the optimum fuel blend in IC engine. International Journal of Decision Support Systems, 1(3), 268-293.
Shahkooh, K. A., Saghafi, F., & Abdollahi, A. (2008). A proposed model for e-Government maturity. In 2008 3rd International conference on information and communication technologies: From theory to applications (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
Siau, K., & Long, Y. (2005). Synthesizing e‐government stage models–a meta‐synthesis based on meta‐ethnography approach. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105(4), 443-458.
Stanujkic, D., Djordjevic, B., & Djordjevic, M. (2013). Comparative analysis of some prominent MCDM methods: A case of ranking Serbian banks. Serbian journal of management, 8(2), 213-241.
Strielkowski, W., Gryshova, I., & Kalyugina, S. (2017). Modern Technologies in Public Administration Management: A Comparison of Estonia, India and United Kingdom. Administration & Public Management Review, (28), 174-185.
Taghavifard, M. T., Fadaei, R., & Ebrahimi, S. (2014). E-democracy adoption factors by e-government citizens. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, Science Explorer Publications, 8(8), 1114-1125.
Trechsel, A. H. (2007). E-voting and electoral participation. In The Dynamics of Referendum Campaigns: An International Perspective (pp. 159-182). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Trechsel, A. H., Kucherenko, V., Silva, F., & Gasser, U. (2016). Potential and challenges of e-voting in the European Union. www.europarl.europa.eu Accessed 10 October 2018.
Tuan, N. A. (2017). Personnel Evaluation and Selection using a Generalized Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making. International Journal of Soft Computing, 12(4), 263-269.
Tuan, N. A. (2018). Developing a generalized fuzzy multi-criteria decision making for personnel selection, Fuzzy Economic Review, 23(2), 27-41.
Van der Meer, T. G., Gelders, D., & Rotthier, S. (2014). E-democracy: exploring the current stage of e-government. Journal of Information Policy, 4, 489-506.
Vassil, K., Solvak, M., Vinkel, P., Trechsel, A. H., & Alvarez, R. M. (2016). The diffusion of internet voting. Usage patterns of internet voting in Estonia between 2005 and 2015. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 453-459.
Voting system. (2018). The Council of the European Union report, www.consilium.europa.eu/en/council-eu/voting-system/ Accessed 10 October 2018.
Wang, K. H. K., Mondal, S. K., Chan, K. C., & Xie, X. (2017). A review of contemporary e-voting: Requirements, technology, systems and usability. Data Science and Pattern Recognition, 1(1), 31-47.
Wescott, C. G. (2001). E-Government in the Asia-pacific region. Asian Journal of Political Science, 9 (2), 1-24.
Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Kildienė, S. (2014). State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods. Technological and economic development of economy, 20(1), 165-179.
Zetter, K. (2008). The Cost of E-Voting, Wired magazine, www.wired.com/2008/04/the-cost-of-e-v/ Accessed 10 October 2018.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
